Lethal Weapon 3 (1992) Review

Director: Richard Donner

Genre(s): Action, Comedy, Crime, Thriller

Runtime: 118 minutes (theatrical version), 121 minutes (director’s cut)

MPAA Rating: R

IMDb Page

Police detective duo Martin Riggs (Mel Gibson) and Roger Murtaugh (Danny Glover) return once again in what is the weakest entry into the film series. The plot is less focused here, having something to do with an ex-cop, Jack Travis (Stuart Wilson), who’s obsessed with putting confiscated firearms back on the streets. Most of the picture feels a bit on the tired side, but it has enough redeeming value to make it an okay time-waster.

The pacing of Lethal Weapon 3 is noticeably less propulsive than that of the first two movies. This is partially because it takes a while for the plot to fully materialize. There’s also a fairly extensive romantic subplot for Riggs, which fits in well with his character, but also slows down the action at times. Like Lethal Weapon 2 (1989), this one ups the humor level at the expense of the more hard-boiled content (the violence is the tamest of the four pictures, for example), but the banter between Riggs and Murtaugh isn’t always as sharp as it used to be. Fortunately, Joe Pesci’s character Leo Getz is back and still has it.

The third Lethal Weapon flick does improve significantly on repeated viewings, however. The action sequences are still solid, with the best one being the fiery finale, appropriately enough. Gibson and Glover unsurprisingly still work well together, and the film, as a whole, isn’t boring…which counts for a lot.

This is probably what the Lethal Weapon series feels like on autopilot. Most of the elements that made the franchise famous are here, but it mostly feels like just another day at the office with Riggs and Murtaugh. It begins and ends strong, but the middle probably could’ve been constructed better. So, would I recommend Lethal Weapon 3? Well, if you enjoyed the other members of the series, then sure, give the director’s cut a watch (it’s pretty lucky to be tied to such a good quadrilogy). Don’t expect greatness, just a decent way to spent two hours.

My rating is 6 outta 10.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s